State ex rel. Pulliam v. Fort
Missouri Court of Appeals
Application for Writ of Prohibition. (1) The county court has original and exclusive jurisdiction to grant dramshop licenses and to examine and pass on the applications and petition for same. R. S. 1899, secs. 2993, 2997; State v. Evans, 83 Mo. 319; Austin v. State, 10 Mo. 591; Bean v. Barton Co. Court, 33 Mo.
Read the full summary
Application for Writ of Prohibition. (1) The county court has original and exclusive jurisdiction to grant dramshop licenses and to examine and pass on the applications and petition for same. R. S. 1899, secs. 2993, 2997; State v. Evans, 83 Mo. 319; Austin v. State, 10 Mo. 591; Bean v. Barton Co. Court, 33 Mo. App. 635. (2) The county court having original and exclusive jurisdiction to hear and determine the sufficiency of application and petitions for a dram-shop license, and the writ of certiorari furnishing a complete remedy should the court err in determining the same, the circuit court…
1Opinion of the CourtBland, P. J.
On the petition of J. P. Campbell, A. B. Young et ah, Hon. J. L. Port, judge of the Ripley •circuit court, issued a preliminary order prohibiting ■John A. Pulliam, A. Harper and J. M. Weatherspoon, justices of the county court of Ripley county, from con*332sidering or acting upon the application of John A. Patterson and E. Lacy for a license to keep a dramshop in. Doniphan township, in said Ripley county, which application, with the petition, was filed in said county court April 21, 1904. The petition for the writ presented to Judge Port alleged that the county court of Ripley county had no…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. Circuit Court for Eau Claire CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- State ex rel. McCaffery v. AloeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Speed v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- St. Louis, Kennett & Southern Railroad v. WearSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- State ex rel. Ellis v. ElkinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Van Dyke v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- State ex rel. Bixman v. DentonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
- State ex rel. Wilson v. BurneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- State ex rel. Heller v. ThornhillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- Burkharth v. StephensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.