Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bixman v. Denton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 27, 1908PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Original Proceeding by Prohibition. (1) A certiorari proceeding is a civil suit within the meaning of section 818, Revised Statutes 1899. Woods v. Eckerle, 95 Mo. App. 384; Weston v. Charleston,. 2 Peters 464; Kohl v. United States, 91 U. S. 367; Upshur Co. v. Rich, 135 U. S. 467; McCullough v. Large, 20 Feb. 309; Hendrix v. Kellogg, 32 Ga. 435, 437. (2) The word ‘‘suit,” comprehends not only actions at law, but every judicial proceeding for the enforcement of a right.

Read the full summary

Original Proceeding by Prohibition. (1) A certiorari proceeding is a civil suit within the meaning of section 818, Revised Statutes 1899. Woods v. Eckerle, 95 Mo. App. 384; Weston v. Charleston,. 2 Peters 464; Kohl v. United States, 91 U. S. 367; Upshur Co. v. Rich, 135 U. S. 467; McCullough v. Large, 20 Feb. 309; Hendrix v. Kellogg, 32 Ga. 435, 437. (2) The word ‘‘suit,” comprehends not only actions at law, but every judicial proceeding for the enforcement of a right. Bouvier’s Law Dictionary; Weston v. Charleston, 2 Peters 474; Ex parte Long, 108 U. S. 556; Haines v. Jamison, 39 U. S. 540;…

1Opinion of the CourtBroaddus, P. J.

As there is no controversy about the status of the case we adopt the statement, so far as is pertinent, as we find it in the record made by relator.

“The relator, John N. Bixman, is a dramshop keeper in the city of Clinton, under a license issued to him in July, 1907, and expiring in January, 1908, under order and proceeding of the county court of Henry county, Missouri, granting him such license at its July term, 1907. The respondent is the judge of the Twenty-ninth Judicial Circuit, and as such judge of the circuit court of Henry county, Missouri.
“On the 21st day of June, 1907, the relator,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Kochtitzky v. RileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. State ex rel. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'n v. EbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  3. Cole v. ColeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. State ex rel. Cottrell v. WoffordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  5. State ex rel. Kansas City Auditorium Co. v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hayes v. HayesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. State Ex Rel. R. L. W. v. BillingsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  3. State ex rel. Marshall v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State Ex Rel. Kansas City Public Service Co. v. WaltnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  5. State ex rel. Anderson Motor Service Co. v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API