Legal Opinion

Colgate v. Philadelphia Electric Power Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1927No. 4071PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

The conclusion reached is that the bill filed in this case should be dismissed, which, of course, carries with it a denial of the motion for a preliminary injunction.

Discussion.

The arguments addressed to us on behalf of the respective parties have been of such clarity, fairness, and fullness that there is no need of a prolonged discussion of the merits of this bill. It is the due, however, of counsel whose abilities and industry have thus lightened our labors that we make a statement of some of the reasons which have led us to the conclusion reached.

The complaint of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Cavanaugh v. LooneySupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Osborne v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. In Re the Appraisal of Damages of TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  5. Magruder v. Belle Fourche Valley Water Users' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adams v. Greenwich Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. Frank Mashuda Co. v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  3. Frank Mashuda Company v. County Of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API