Legal Opinion

State v. LaFreniere

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 2008No. DA 06-0768PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Appellant Raymond LaFreniere (LaFreniere) appeals from the order of the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, setting conditions of his probation. We affirm.

¶2 We consider the following issue on appeal:

¶3 Did the District Court err when, pursuant to § 46-23-1011, MCA, it added as a condition to LaFreniere’s probation that he successfully complete Phase II of a sex offender treatment program?

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶4 On October 25, 1984, LaFreniere was charged with one count of sexual intercourse without consent, a felony, pursuant to § 45-5-503(3), MCA (1983).…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. AshbyMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. WeeksMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. LohMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. FergusonMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. AdgersonMontana Supreme Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. WestMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. TriplettMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. MattMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. City of Missoula v. MooreMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Kurtzenacker v. Davis Surveying, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2012

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API