Legal Opinion
Fennell v. Ross
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided June 30, 1986No. 85-178PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment awarding the appellees, the Rosses, who were the sellers, damages for breach of a real estate sale contract against the appellants, the Fennells, who were the buyers. The Fennells answered, contending they had properly rescinded the contract, and they filed a separate counterclaim seeking restitution in the sum of the earnest money they had paid. The basis of the rescission asserted by the Fennells was that the Rosses had misrepresented the property, through their listing broker, in the multiple listing service (MLS) publication by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kruse v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Wise v. DawsonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1975
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stortroen v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Reed v. Smith Steel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
- Continental Assurance Co. v. Cedar Rapids Pediatric ClinicCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Whitten v. Harold Austin Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
- Continental Assurance Company v. Cedar Rapids Pediatric Clinic v. Cedar Rapids Pediatric Clinic Employees Pension Plan and Trust v. Continental Assurance Company, City Lumber Company, Inc. v. Continental Assurance Company, Continental Assurance Company v. Cedar Rapids Pediatric Clinic, Continental Assurance Company v. Dr. Bob E. Hall, Continental Assurance Company v. Robert T. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.