Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Garza v. City of Robstown

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 29, 1972No. 729Published

1ConcurrenceSharpe, Justice

This appeal is from a judgment of the trial court providing that the suit of plaintiff-appellant be dismissed with prejudice. I concur in the affirmance of that judgment for the reasons stated in this separate opinion.

We have heretofore, on December 30, 1971 decided the case of Jose V. Garza, et al. v. H. E. Dare, et al., 475 S.W.2d 340, in which motion for rehearing was not filed; sometimes hereafter referred to as the prior suit. The defendants-appellees in that case were and are the same as in the instant case. However, Rueben Garza, the plaintiff-appellant in the present case was not a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. DixonTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Hallman v. City of PampaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Garza v. DareCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API