Legal Opinion
United States v. Javier Aristizabal Londono, Diego Lopez-Aguilar
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 14, 1996No. 546, Docket 95-1332PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The mandate is recalled to consider' the impact, if any, of the defendant’s deportation prior to argument of the original appeal; upon recall of the mandate, we reinstate the erroneous sentence, remand for correction of the sentence pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a)(1), and vacate the portion of the district court’s order of July 16,1996 that directs the clerk to remove the case from the active calendar.
JACOBS, Circuit Judge:
On January 5, 1996, we issued our opinion in this appeal, holding that the district court (Weinstein, J.) erred in downwardly departing from the statutory minimum sentence…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Villamonte-MarquezSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Raymond RobinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Campos-SerranoSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Microsoft Corporation. United States of America v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Spiegel v. SchulmannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Frank QuattroneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Coperquin Gonzalez-Roque, Also Known as Manuel LedesmaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Osama AwadallahCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Fernando Diaz-Diaz, United States of America v. Fernando Diaz-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.