Legal Opinion

In the Interest of N.M.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 22, 1995No. 94-832PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

Twin sons of M.M. and T.R. were adjudicated children in need of assistance. Shortly before this adjudication, the court had taken the children from their mother’s custody and placed them with their paternal grandmother. Nine months after this placement the court transferred temporary custody to the father. Ater the children had been out of their mother’s custody for seventeen months, the court entered a permanency order granting permanent custody to the father.

The mother appeals on three grounds. First she argues that the permanency hearing was invalid because it was scheduled…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In the Interest of J.R.H.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  2. In Re Laura F.California Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In the Interest of A.M.H.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  4. Hagen v. Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  5. In Interest of MannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In the Interest of K.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  2. In Re Billy W.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. In the Interest of A.A.G.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2005
  4. In the Interest of R.B.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2013
  5. M.R. v. K.R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API