Carlin Communications, Inc. v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
Modem telephonic technology permits the pervasive transmission of vast quantities of information, as well as Shakespeare, Shaw, and smut. The essential question before us is whether a regional telephone company, despite its public utility status, may refuse to carry smut on its dial-a-message network. The district court concluded that it may not. We disagree and therefore vacate the injunction granted below.
I
FACTS
Carlin Communications supplies salacious telephone messages to the public. In early 1985, appellant Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co. (Mountain Bell) began…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State of Missouri v. BidenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
- Robert Kennedy, Jr. v. Elizabeth WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Carlin Communications, Inc. v. The Mountain States Telephone And Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.