Legal Opinion

Carlin Communications, Inc. v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 14, 1987No. 85-2797PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

Modem telephonic technology permits the pervasive transmission of vast quantities of information, as well as Shakespeare, Shaw, and smut. The essential question before us is whether a regional telephone company, despite its public utility status, may refuse to carry smut on its dial-a-message network. The district court concluded that it may not. We disagree and therefore vacate the injunction granted below.

I

FACTS

Carlin Communications supplies salacious telephone messages to the public. In early 1985, appellant Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co. (Mountain Bell) began…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State of Missouri v. BidenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
  2. Robert Kennedy, Jr. v. Elizabeth WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  3. Carlin Communications, Inc. v. The Mountain States Telephone And Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API