Legal Opinion
Marshall v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 2, 1987No. 86-911PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MACK, Associate Judge:
Petitioner Daisy Marshall seeks review of a decision of the District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission (“RHC” or “Commission”). She alleges, first, that the RHC erred in holding that a landlord may increase the rent ceiling of a vacant rental unit to the rent ceiling of a rental unit located in a different building. Second, she claims that the RHC erred in concluding that the decision of the Rent Administrator —which found in favor of petitioner on the issue of rent overcharges — was not supported by substantial evidence. Lastly, she asks us to find that the RHC…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Girouard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Parreco v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Tenley & Cleveland Park Emergency Committee v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Jerome Management, Inc. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Capitol Hill Restoration Society v. District of Columbia Mayor's Agent for Historic PreservationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- In re C.L.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.