Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1911No. 16,679PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county: Willard E. Stewart, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSedgwick, J.

The defendant was prosecuted under section 6 of the criminal code. The defendant was found guilty. The sentence was imprisonment in the penitentiary, as provided by the statute, and he has brought the case here for review.

1. The defendant moved to quash the indictment for. duplicity, and in other ways raised the question whether this indictment charges more than one offense against the defendant. The part of the indictment challenged charges that the defendant “unlawfully, feloniously and maliciously did then and there use and employ, and did then and there unlawfully and wilfully advise to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. FeroDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1883
  2. Argabright v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Hubert v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  4. State v. PischelNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Smith v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Johnson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  3. State v. ButlerNebraska Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Johnson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  5. McKee v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API