Legal Opinion

Hubert v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1905No. 14,096PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county: Edward P. Holmes, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

Philip Hubert, who will hereafter be called the plaintiff, was convicted in the district court for Lancaster county *221of the crime of statutory rape, and from a judgment sentencing him to he confined in the state penitentiary for the period of six years he prosecutes error.

The information on which he was tried, omitting the formal parts, reads as follows: “That Philip Hubert, late of the county aforesaid, on the 4th day of August, A. D. 1904, in the county of Lancaster and state of Nebraska, aforesaid, then and there being, did feloniously and unlawfully in and upon one Lilian Harding, a female…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Woodruff v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Garrison v. PeopleNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  3. United States v. FeroDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1883
  4. Edwards v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Hall v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Frank v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State v. LauritsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. AnchetaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Nabower v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Hughes v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API