Edholm v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.
Plaintiff sued to quiet title to certain particularly described tracts of land in the city of Omaha, basing his claim of title on continuous, hostile, adverse possession thereof, under claim of right by him and his predecessors in title for a period of more than ten years antedating the commencement of this action. The defendant answered and set up that it was a railway corporation; that the tracts of land in controversy formed a part of its right of way for railway purposes and had been obtained by condemnation pro*846ceedings in the exercise of the right of eminent domain, and denied that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Laramie Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Krueger v. JenkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
- McLucas v. St. Joseph & Grand Island Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Lydick v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gustin v. ScheeleNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Harrison v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Lancaster County ex rel. Rosewell v. GrahamNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
- Sjuts v. GRANVILLE CEMETARY ASS'NNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- Central Irrigation District v. Gering Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.