Legal Opinion

State v. Pezzella

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 12, 1981No. 80-1514PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BASKIN, Judge.

We reverse the trial court’s suppression of “Evidence Obtained Through Unreasonable Search and Seizure”. Neither the motion nor the order specified the evidence to be suppressed. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.190(h)(2).

The trial court’s refusal to permit the state to proffer evidence defeats our evaluation of the arguments on appeal concerning the necessity for consent to a warrant-less interception of a telephone call to defendant’s home upon which defendant contends probable cause for his arrest was based and concerning the unavailability of a witness who invoked the Fifth Amendment. A…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Norman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Piccirrillo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. No. Miami Gen. Hosp. v. Royal Palm Beach ColonyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. State v. JacksonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Suarez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API