Legal Opinion

Howe v. Gillespie

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 22, 1919No. 5343PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Oklahoma; John H. Cotteral, Judge. Suit by E. N. Gillespie against R. F. Howe. From a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Circuit Judge.

This is another of the cases tried with Washburn v. Gillespie, 261 Fed. 41,-C. C. A.-, determined at this term. The contentions are the same, except that this appellant claims that his lease was to be the same as that given by Frank Wright and involved in Frank Wright v. E. N. Gillespie, 261 Fed. 46,-C. C. A. -, also decided at this term. The trial court found against this claim, and a thorough examination of the evidence reveals no substantial reason for disturbing that conclusion.

The decree is affirmed.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Washburn v. GillespieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
  2. Wright v. GillespieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Renfrow v. GillespieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
  2. Sutherland v. GillespieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919