Legal Opinion
Denver Omnibus & Cab Co. v. Gast
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided November 6, 1911No. 6735PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error to Denver District Court. — Hon. George W. Allen, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court 1
Upon Petition for Rehearing.
2Opinion of the Court · HillJustice Hill
This action was brought by Wilson M. Gast against The Denver Omnibus and Cab Company, The Union Depot and Railway Company, and The Chicago Burlington and Quincy Railway Company, to recover damages for the loss of his *19trunk and contents. The verdict of the jury and .judgment were against The Denver Omnibus and Cab Company, but in favor of the other defendants. The cab company brings the case here for review on error: By stipulation Martha E. Gast, administratrix of the estate of Wilson M. Gast, deceased, has been substituted as defendant in error.
The complaint…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Bessemer Irrigating Ditch Co. v. WoolleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
- Pike v. SuttonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. EyserSupreme Court of Colorado · 1873
- Carper v. RisdonColorado Court of Appeals · 1904
- Hill v. GroesbeckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Willson v. Colorado & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1914
- O'Rourke v. O'RourkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
- American Smelting & Refining Co. v. HicksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918