Legal Opinion

Russell v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 14, 1973No. 57580PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARDGETT, Judge.

This is an appeal from .the judgment of the circuit court denying movant-appellant Walter Russell’s (hereafter “movant”) Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R. motion by which he sought to have a judgment of conviction of forcible rape, a felony, entered on his plea of guilty September 14, 1959, vacated. Notice of appeal was filed prior to January 1, 1972. This court has jurisdiction. Mo. Const., Art. V, § 31(4), as amended 1970.

Movant’s efforts to have the rape conviction set aside consist of the following:

In 1962, movant instituted a proceeding for a writ of habeas corpus in .the Circuit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brizendine v. SwensonDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1969
  3. Maggard v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  4. Russell v. SwensonDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1966
  5. Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McCrary v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. State v. ClevelandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. State v. KirkseyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Bibee v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Russell v. WyrickDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API