St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Fitzmartin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Superior Court, Oklahoma County; A. N. Munden, Judge. Action by Thomas Fitzmartin against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company, a corporation, and H. E. Clark. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THACKER, C.
Plaintiff in error will be designated as defendant, and defendant in error will be designated as plaintiff, in accord with their respective titles in the trial court.
Plaintiff, upon the verdict of a jury, recovered judgment in tlie trial court for the sum of $10,000 as damages for the alleged unlawful, wrongful, willful, and malicious failure and refusal of the defendant, after demand by him made upon it, to give him what is known as a service letter, stating the cause for which it had discharged him from its service as its freight train conductor, and otherwise complying…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- St. Louis S. W. Ry. Co. of Texas v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Dickinson v. PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919