Legal Opinion
Bornas v. Standard Accident Insurance Co. of Detroit
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 21, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBastow, J.
The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict of a jury directed by the court at the close of the evidence in favor of the defendant dismissing the complaints of the respective plaintiffs. The latter had recovered judgments against one Gladys Howell based upon her negligent operation of an automobile resulting in personal injuries and property damage to the plaintiffs. The present actions were brought against the defendant pursuant to the provision of paragraph (b) of subdivision 1 of section 167 of the Insurance Law. There were two principal issues litigated upon the trial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Blum v. Fresh Grown Preserve Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Lewis v. Guardian Fire & Life Assurance Co. of London, EnglandNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Wearever Upholstery & Furniture Corp. v. Home InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Mechanics & Traders Insurance v. HimmelsteinOhio Court of Appeals · 1926
- C. A. Smith Lumber Co. v. Colonial Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
3Cited by3 opinions
- Musso v. American Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. of IllinoisNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Sielski v. Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark, New JerseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Shattuck v. Dryden Mut. Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026