United States v. Skeddle
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
Order
CARR, District Judge.
This is a criminal case in which defendants are charged with wire and mail fraud, money laundering and conspiracy. The government proposes to introduce into evidence under the business records exception to the hearsay rule documents handwritten by defendant David Hobe and one of his accounting partners, Floyd Trouten, III. (Doc. 782). Defendants Skeddle, Costin & Bryant and defendant Hobe filed memoranda in opposition to this proffered evidence, arguing that the government has not laid a proper foundation for admissibility of the notes. (Docs. 783,-). For the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. James Harrison HathawayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Jeffrey Kassel v. Gannett Co., Inc., D/B/A "Usa Today,"Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Lee William SachsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Robert C. Jacoby and Thomas SkubalCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Redken Laboratories, Inc. v. Herb Levin D/B/A Levin Beauty Supply and Levin Beauty Supply, Inc., a Michigan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fed. Ins. Co. v. Courtney (In re Courtney)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019