Legal Opinion

Hauben v. Morris

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pécora, J.

The plaintiffs are stockholders of the Industrial Finance Corporation. They bring this action in equity on their own behalf and on behalf of all other stockholders similarly situated, against certain of the directors of the corporation, to recover, on behalf of the corporation moneys alleged to have been acquired by the directors with others, in violation of the fiduciary duty which such directors owed to the corporation. While the trial lasted many, days and the evidence is voluminous, the essential facts may be simply stated.

Industrial Finance Corporation is a holding company. It…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  2. Magruder v. DrurySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Jackson v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Munson v. Syracuse, Geneva & Corning R. R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Seymour v. Spring Forest Cemetery Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mountain State Steel Foundries, Inc., and v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, AndCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
  2. Knox Glass Bottle Co. v. UnderwoodMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Baxter v. Lancer Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1963
  4. Pink v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Silverstein v. ClarksonNew York Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API