Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Goulden.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 26, 1904PublishedCited by 12 opinions

INDICTMENT against Julius Golden, heard by Judge T. A. McNeill and a jury, at August Term, 1903, of the Superior Court of Rockingham County.

1DissentDouglas, J.

The defendant was indicted, under the Code, sec. 988, for bigamy. The admissions of the defendant were competent to prove the first marriage. S. v. Wylde, 110 N.C. 500; S. v. Melton,120 N.C. 591; 2 McLain Cr. Law, sec. 1083, and cases cited in note 6; 2 Bish. Stat. Cr. (2 Ed.), sec. 610. It was therefore not error to admit evidence that when the defendant, about three weeks before the second marriage, stated his intention to (745) marry, and was charged with the existence of his first wife, he had replied, "I wish I could hear she was dead, so I could be a free man." The defendant stated that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fleming v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. State v. AbbeySupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
  3. State v. CallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. State v. . WyldeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  5. Commonwealth v. HaydenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. . BarksdaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. State v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Coral Gables Corp. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  5. State v. ConnorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API