Legal Opinion
City of Newark v. North Jersey District Water Supply Commission
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 6, 1969PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Mintz in the Chancery Division, 106 N. J. Super. 88.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weinxeaub and Justices Jacobs, Feancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Sohettino and HaneMAN - 7.
For reversal — Hone.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Newark v. North Jersey Dist. Water Sup. Comm.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
3Cited by12 opinions
- Culver v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Dept. of Pub. Advocate v. NJ Bd. of Pub. Ut.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Schiff v. SchiffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- McMahon v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- Dworman v. Mayor & Bd. of Aldermen, Etc., MorristownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.