Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Poetker

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 26, 1914No. 302PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana.

1Per curiam

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of *684(1) First National Bank v. Estherville, 215 U. S. 341, 346; Rogers v. Clark Iron Co., 217 U. S. 589; May v. Illinois, 232 U. S. 720; (2) McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U. S. 432, 437; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 326, 334; City of Lewiston v. Chamberlain, 234 U. S. 751.

Mr. Charles Martindale for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Frank S. Roby and Mr.-Ward H. Watson for the defendant in error.

2Cases cited6 opinions

Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
McCorquodale v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
First National Bank v. City Council of EsthervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
Rogers v. Clark Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
City of Lewiston v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936