Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Gardner

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 16, 2018No. 17-1672PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

Michael Gardner shared a cell phone with his seventeen-year-old girlfriend, B.H., to facilitate her "sex dates" with other men. When one of B.H.'s clients turned out to be an undercover officer, she agreed to let police search the phone. A jury convicted Gardner of trafficking a minor for sex and producing child pornography, primarily based on evidence recovered from the phone. On appeal, Gardner urges us to vacate his convictions on the ground that the district court erroneously admitted the phone evidence during the trial, among other alleged errors. We decline the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. United States v. Aaron L. SalvoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. PenneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Dwayne ShecklesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  2. Dakari Jahi Lenear v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2026
  3. United States v. Amador Magallon GuerreroCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2026
  4. William Jeffrey Knight v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API