Legal Opinion

Paul Harrington v. Jack Sorelle

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 2, 1963No. 7110_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SETH, Circuit Judge.

This is an action for an accounting and for damages for breach of contract brought by one joint adventurer against the other. The defendant asks for an accounting also, and for judgment in the amount that may be shown due to him by such accounting. The agreement of the joint adventure was oral, had no stated duration, and provided for the participation by the parties in the retail sale of used cars at Grants, New Mexico. The trial court dismissed the complaint and also denied the relief sought by the defendant. The plaintiff appeals.

The basic facts are set out in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Homestake Mining Co. v. Mid-Continent Exploration Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  2. William G. Libby v. L.J. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  3. Eagle-Picher Co. v. Mid-Continent Lead & Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. Judson v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  5. Buckley v. AltheimerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. Manitowoc Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Sims Consolidated, Ltd. v. Irrigation and Power Equipment, Inc., a Colorado CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
  4. Allison v. DilsaverMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. RX Savings, LLC v. BeschDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API