B.N.P. ex rel. J.F. v. D.M.P.

I concur in the result to affirm for the reasons stated in Judge Murdock’s opinion curring in the result. I write specially to note a potential additional reason why B.NP.’s Rule 60(b), Ala. R. Civ. P., motion was not proper. There is a tension between the language that appears in two opinions of the Alabama Supreme Court, Ex parte State of Alabama ex rel. State of Ohio, 718 So.2d 669 (Ala.1998), and Ex parte Jenkins, 723 So.2d 649 (Ala.1998), regarding whether § 26-17-6(a), Ala.Code 1975, “applies in an action brought to determine the existence of the father-and-child relationship when a…