Legal Opinion · Dissent

First National Bank in Plant City v. Dickinson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 9, 1969No. 19Published

1DissentJustice Douglas

It will come as a shock, where common sense is the guide, to learn that an armored car picking up merchants’ cash boxes and checks is a branch bank. Conceivably a bank could use an armored car as a place of business by stationing it at designated places during designated hours for opening accounts, receiving deposits, making *139loans, and the like. But no armored car was so used in these cases.

Federal law stated in the McFadden Act, 12 U. S. C, § 36 (f), defines “branch” as any facility “at which deposits are received, or checks paid, or money lent.” And Congress provided that national banks may…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Gray v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API