Legal Opinion

Bankers Farm Mortgage Co. v. Christofferson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The action is for foreclosure of a mortgage. The land was in a drainage district. Subsequent to' the execution of the mortgage, the lands were sold for nonpayment of drainage assessments. The defendant Christofferson bought in the land at a sale for nonpayment of the drainage assessments made by the county treasurer by direction of the circuit court pursuant to sec. 89.37 (4) (d), Stats. Christ-offerson is the husband of one of the children of the deceased mortgagor. ' He claims the same right as anyone else to buy the property at the county treasurer’s sale, and to hold the land free from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dancy Drainage District v. Hanchett Bond Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Yates v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Edgerton v. SchneiderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  4. McMahon v. Lower Baraboo River Drainage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Olson v. McDonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Dorst v. SommersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Magee v. WhitacreNevada Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API