Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Dorst v. Sommers

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

In determining the effect of an amendment upon a statute in existence for many years, the history of the law is important, and consideration must be given to the practice that grew up under the statute while in its original form.

The amendment to sec. 75.01 (1), Stats., reads: “provided, that when an application is made ... to redeem from any tax sale, any part or portion of any lot or parcel of land . . . the county clerk [now county treasurer] . . . is authorised to ascertain, by affidavits or by actual view, the true proportion of taxes chargeable to the part or portion sought to be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Real Estate Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Dalrymple v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Sheboygan County v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Yates v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Bankers Farm Mortgage Co. v. ChristoffersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Anderton v. SommersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API