Legal Opinion
BROOKS v. CITY OF CARMEL
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided September 15, 2020No. 1:18-cv-00613Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION GARY W. BROOKS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:18-cv-00613-TWP-TAB ) CITY OF CARMEL and DOUGLAS C. HANEY, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Summary Judgment filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 by Defendants City of Carmel ("Carmel") and Douglas C. Haney ("Haney") (collectively, "Defendants") (Filing No. 32). Plaintiff Gary W. Brooks ("Brooks") initiated this lawsuit, bringing claims for violation of Title II of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.