Mammoth Mining Co. v. Grand Central Mining Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP UTAH AND THE DISTRICT COURT OP JUAB COUNTY, STATE OP UTAH. The facts 'are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
' This suit was begun by the Grand Central Mining Company to recover for the removal of ores from beneath the surface of its Silveropolis mining claim, and for an injunction. The defendant, the Mammoth Mining Company, filed a counter claim, setting up that it was the owner of certain mining claims, especially the First Northern Extension of the Mammoth Mining Claim, Lot No. 38, being senior to all the other claims concerned; the Bradley, and the Golden King; the last two being to the west of the Mammoth Extension, between it and the Silveropolis, with more or less overlapping; and that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chrisman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Lawson v. United States Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Iron Silver Mining Co. v. CheesmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Egan v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- St. Louis Mining & Milling Co. v. Montana Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stewart Mining Co. v. Ontario Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Grand Central Mining Co. v. Mammoth Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1909
- Gold, Silver & Tungsten, Inc. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- Chief Consol. Min. Co. v. Mammoth Min. Co. of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Gold, Silver & Tungsten, Inc. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.