Legal Opinion
Pierce v. Cnty. of Marin
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 14, 2018No. Case No. 17–cv–03409–SIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; DIRECTING PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL TO SERVE DEFENDANT PENDER WITH FAC (U.S. MARSHALS NO LONGER REQUIRED TO EFFECT SERVICE)
Re: Dkt. No. 48
SUSAN ILLSTON, United States District Judge *987On February 2, 2018, the Court held a hearing on the Marin County defendants' motion to dismiss the first amended complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES defendants' motion.
BACKGROUND
I. Factual Background
This lawsuit arises from plaintiff Jillian L. Pierce's repeated arrests and detentions based on a warrant issued for another…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Astorga v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- G. v. City of LafayetteDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Oster v. City of CapitolaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Sanchez v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021