Peretto v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
From a conviction upon a charge of having possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell, the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, has appealed. He was charged with having possession of 16 gallons of “choc” beer and 1% gallons of wine and two-thirds of a quart of whisky. The evidence on the part of the state sustained the allegation, which was denied by the defendant, who testified that he had only 5 or 6 gallons of “choc” beer and no wine or whisky.
Complaint is made by defendant: First, that the evidence is not sufficient; second, that the court erred in its…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rambo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
- Hertzel v. WeberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Cunningham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
- Prendergrast v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
3Cited by2 opinions
- Phelps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926