Legal Opinion

Howard v. Reckling

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Baker: Robert Eakin, Judge. Suit by Wm. H. Howard against Ferdinand Reckling and others to foreclose a mortgage. Defendants appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to their answer.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Wolverton.

This is a suit to foreclose a mortgage on a homestead claim executed by the patentee thereof to plaintiff March 8, 1895, to secure certain indebtedness by him then contracted. The defendants answered, setting up as a defense thereto, that final proof touching said premises was made October 3, 1894, and that the patent was not issued until July 17, 1895, and therefore, that the premises could not be subject to the payment of such indebtedness. To the answer a demurrer was interposed and sustained, and the action of the court in this regard constitutes the only…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Orr v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Spiess v. NeubergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Nycum v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  4. Lang v. MoreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. Kirkaldie v. LarrabeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stark v. MorganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Thompson v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API