Legal Opinion
Stakis v. Dimitroff
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 27, 1931No. 20591PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This is an action brought by defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against plaintiffs in error, hereinafter referred to as defendants, to recover the sum of $1,660.
The petition declares on two causes of action. Under the first cause of action plaintiff sought to recover the sum of $1,200 for money loaned, and represented by a postdated cheek alleged to have been signed by defendants. The second cause of action was to recover tile sum of $460, alleged to have been stolen from the person of plaintiff by defendants..
Defendant Helen Stakis answered separately by general…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. of St. Paul v. RobisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Brown v. First National Bank of TempleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Farmers' Union Gin Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Collier v. GannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Rogers v. BenfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bunch v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- LPCX CORP. v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Polson v. PirtleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Quarles v. PanchalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.