Legal Opinion

Babcock Coal Co. v. City of Boston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 7, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

The plaintiff had a written contract with the defendant for the furnishing of coal to individuals upon the order of the overseers of the public welfare department *519in 1935 and 1936. What the plaintiff proposed to furnish was coal known as “Belle Wyoming & Carbondale coal,” produced at the “mines” of “Kehoe Berge Coal Co.” at Pittston, Pennsylvania, and “to be purchased” from H. N. Hartwell & Son, Inc. The general specifications of the contract called only for “chestnut size of fresh-mined American anthracite of best quality shipped from mines located in” certain named counties in Pennsylvania.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morse v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  2. Reading Steel Casting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Wiley v. Inhabitants of AtholMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  4. Rudnick v. RudnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  5. Schmoll Fils & Co. v. S. L. Agoos Tanning Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carlo Bianchi & Co. v. Builders' Equipment & Supplies Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  2. Carrig v. Gilbert-Varker Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Kennedy v. B. A. Gardetto, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Lander v. Samuel Heller Leather Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  5. Nicholson v. American Hide & Leather Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API