Legal Opinion

Caswell Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 15, 1912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Travis County. Action by the State against Caswell & Smith. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

By section 12, e. 18, of the Acts of the First-Called Session of the Thirtieth Legislature, p. 479, all dealers in pistols and other firearms were required to make report, under oath, to the Comptroller on or before the 1st of July, 1907, and quarterly thereafter, showing the gross amount, collected and uncollected, from sales of such firearms during the preceding quarter, and at the same time to pay to the State Treasurer an occupation tax of 50 per cent, of the gross receipts of all such sales, as shown by said report; and section 19 of said act prescribed a penalty of 10 per cent, in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Presser v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. State v. DukeTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Andrews v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Fife v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1876

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kalodimos v. Village of Morton GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Riley v. Ayer & Lord Tie. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Kalodimos v. Village of Morton GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Kalodimos v. Village of Morton GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API