Tatkin v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.
California Court of Appeal
1DissentHerndon, J.
I dissent. The majority opinion strongly argues, and apparently holds, that the practice of medicine in California constitutes “trade or commerce” within the meaning of the Cartwright Act. The uncertainty as to what the majority opinion actually holds in this regard stems from the following described aspects thereof:(1) The opinion discusses and quotes from several federal court decisions which arrive at divergent and conflicting conclusions as to whether or not the practice of medicine is “trade or commerce” within the meaning of the federal anti-monopoly statutes. By its treatment of these…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Oregon State Medical SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. National Ass'n of Real Estate BoardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.