LaFountain v. Attorney General
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
Three prisoners brought three separate actions challenging the constitutionality of MCL 791.233b; MSA 28.2303(3), which eliminated "allowances for good time” in determining eligibility for parole with regard to certain crimes. Defendants filed a motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(8). Subsequently, the cases were consolidated because all the claims present identical questions of law. The court granted defendants’ motion for summary disposition, finding that plaintiffs had failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
Plaintiff Wayne LaFountain now appeals. We…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. WatermanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Consumers Power Co. v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Michigan Beer & Wine Wholesalers Ass'n v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. KildowMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Line v. MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.