Legal Opinion

Bay-Houston Towing Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 13, 2003No. 01-88LPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

This is an action for a permanent and/or temporary taking pursuant to the Fifth Amendment. Plaintiff Bay-Houston Towing Company and third party plaintiff J.A. Hartman Corporation own peat bogs in Michigan. They assert that their property was taken without compensation during the process to obtain a permit for mining peat. Pending are plaintiffs’ and defendant’s cross-motions for summary judgment as well as defendant’s motion to dismiss. Oral argument was held June 5, 2003, after which the court requested supplemental briefing. For the reasons set forth below,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bay-Houston Towing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API