Legal Opinion
Hicks v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 21, 2004PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve late notices of claim, the petitioners and nonparty Mary Ann Zadrozny separately appeal from so much an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated July 10, 2003, as denied those branches of the petition which were for leave to serve late notices of claim against the respondents City of New York, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, and Kings County Hospital Center and denied that branch of the petitioners’ separate motion which was to amend the caption.
Ordered that the order is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lodati v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Kittredge v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Valestil v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jordan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Wright v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Acosta v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Roland v. Nassau County Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Catterson v. Suffolk County Department of Health ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.