Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Cloutier v. State
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 30, 2012No. 2010-714Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
MANIAS, J.,
retired superior court justice, specially assigned under RSA 490:3, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I agree with the majority that the prior retirement statutes created a contract between the State and the petitioners and that RSA chapter 100-C impairs that contract. I also agree that the salary adjustments provided for by Laws 2003, 311:3 and Laws 2005,177:96 should not be included in calculating benefits under the prior retirement statutes. However, I disagree that the case should be remanded for further findings by the trial court as to whether the impairment of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Houlton Citizens' Coalition v. Town of HoultonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Sal Tinnerello & Sons, Inc. v. Town of Stonington Stonington Resource Recovery Authority and Donald R. Maranell, First SelectmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Sylvestre v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Wagoner v. GainerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- Miles v. Tennessee Consolidated Retirement SystemTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.