Legal Opinion

McKellips v. McKellips

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided April 30, 1986No. 08-86-00077-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION

OSBORN, Justice.

Pursuant to Rule 21c, Tex.R.Civ.P., Lillian McKellips has filed a motion and an amended motion for extension of time to file a transcript and statement of facts in the above case. The judgment was signed on December 26, 1985. A motion for new trial was timely filed. The appeal bond was required to be filed within ninety days or by March 26, 1986. Rule 356, Tex.R. Civ.P. The transcript and statement of facts were required to be filed within one hundred days after the judgment was signed. Rule 386, Tex.R.Civ.P. The record was due on April 5, 1986. Since that was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Odom v. Olafson, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
  2. Monk v. Dallas Brake and Clutch Service Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  3. Intertex, Inc. v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Container Port Services, Inc. v. Gage, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1986
  2. McKellips v. McKellips, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1986
  3. Sumner & Greener v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API