Legal Opinion
State of NY v. Solvent Chemical Co., Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided May 7, 1998No. 83-CV-1401CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BACKGROUND
CURTIN, District Judge.
Currently before the court are (1) .third-party defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation’s (“Conrail”) motion for summary judgment against third-party plaintiffs Solvent Chemical Co., Inc. (“Solvent”), Mader Capital, Inc. (“Mader”), and ICC Industries, Inc. (“ICC”) (Item 268), and (2) Solvent’s cross-motion for partial summary judgment against Conrail (Item 277). Oral argument on these motions was first held on December 16,1994 (Item 335). After that, both Conrail and Solvent submitted numerous briefs and letters in support of their positions.'. The parties…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Olin Corp. v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. State of Ill.Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1976
- Penn Cent. Corp. v. United StatesSpecial Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1994
- Schweitzer v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. United StatesSpecial Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. RAY, EX REL. BOYDDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- (PS) Portnoy v. DeMoreDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. RayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010