Legal Opinion

Gonzales, Jose Iii

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 5, 2015No. PD-0179-15Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE ( COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS JOSE GONZALES 111, Petitioner/ THE STATE OF TEXSS/ Appellee. COURT OF CRIMINALappeals PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS AUG 05 2015 THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS Abe) Acosta, Clerk CAUSE NO. 13-13-00011-CR. ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INDEX OF AUTHORITIES II-IV. STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT Vo STATEMENT OF THE CASE . o - . . VI . STATEMENT REGARDING PROCEDURAL HISTORY.. VII. GROUNDS FOR REVIEW • - VIII-I3i>: ARGUMENTS AND AUTHORITIES 1-16. CONCLUSION 16. PRAYER FOR RELIEF. «...…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API