Legal Opinion
Bott v. DeLand
Utah Supreme Court
Decided July 12, 1996No. 930387Published
1Opinion of the Court
922 P.2d 732 (1996)
Roger BOTT, Plaintiff, Appellant, and Cross-Appellee,
v.
Gary W. DeLAND, Blen Freestone, Dean Laney, and Robert F. Powell, Defendants, Appellees, and Cross-Appellants.
No. 930387.
Supreme Court of Utah.
July 12, 1996.
Ross C. Anderson, Steven W. Dougherty, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff.
Jan Graham, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth King, Carol Clawson, Asst. Attys. Gen., Salt Lake City, for defendants.
HOWE, Justice:
Plaintiff Roger Bott appeals from the district court's judgment that the Utah Governmental Immunity Act, Utah Code Ann. § 63-30-34(1)(a) & (b), limits to $250,000 his recovery of…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.