Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Buskohl Construction Inc.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 2015No. 20150006PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEVERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] John Buskohl and Buskohl Construction Inc. (collectively “Buskohl”) appeal from a district court’s judgment entered on a jury verdict and from an amended order denying a motion for a new trial. We conclude the district court erred in admitting hearsay evidence that did not fall within an exclusion or exception. We reverse the district court’s judgment and remand for a new trial, because the district court’s error affected Buskohl’s substantial right to a fair trial.

I

[¶2] Zachary Johnson and Margie Johnson contracted with Buskohl Construction Inc. as a general contractor…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. North American Pump Corp. v. Clay Equipment Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. WannerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Jarvis v. JarvisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Grand Forks County Social Services v. T.L.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Braunberger v. Interstate Engineering, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Continental Resources, Inc. v. P&P Industries, LLC INorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Estate of FroemkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  3. N.B. v. TerwilligerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Rentz v. BNSF Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Boyda v. Boyda, et al.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API