Legal Opinion

Anderson & Kerr v. State Industrial Com.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 19, 1932No. 21985PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwindadd, J.

This is an original proceeding instituted in this court by the petitioners above named against the respondents above named to vacate an award made by the State Industrial Commission on the 14th day of November, 1930, as modified by a subsequent order made by the State Industrial Commission on the 1st day of December, 1930.

The facts disclosed by the record are briefly as follows: On the 20th day of September, 1930, the respondent, Bill Sloan, was employed as a rotary helper by the petitioners, Anderson & Kerr, in the drilling of an oil well in the Oklahoma City field. He was an experienced oil…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stasmos v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Willis v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Marland Refining Co. v. ColbaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Hopkinson v. KennedyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Oklahoma City v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. Horn v. Broadway GarageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. McKenzie v. Brixite Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  4. Eagle-Picher Company v. McGuireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  5. Shoemake Station v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API