Legal Opinion

Loring v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 17, 1980No. 77-2985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

610 F.2d 649

Ramona LORING and Lester Loring, wife and husband, for and

on behalf of themselves and approximately 200 other members

of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community similarly

situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES of America and the City of Scottsdale,

Arizona, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 77-2985.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 17, 1979.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 17, 1980.

Wayne C. Arnett, Patten, Montague & Arnett, Tempe, Ariz., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Clifford Sherr, Asst. City Atty., Scottsdale, Ariz., argued for defendants-appellees; James W. Moorman, Asst.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scholder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. Loring v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. Kraemer Mills, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Big Spring v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. California State Board of EqualizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API